|
|
|
To join The Indian American Chemical
Society (TIACS), please send an email to: TIACS-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
|
|
Issue 65
|
5111 Kali Era, Virodhi
Year, Shravana
month
2067
Vikramarka Era, Virodhi
Year, Shravana month
1931
Salivahana
Era, Virodhi
Year, Shravana
month
2009
AD, August
|
|
Home
Management
AJIN
TSJ
MS
Vegetarian Links
Disclaimer
Soliciataion
Contact
VPC
More Links
Vedah
|
Sugar Pill
Problem for Big Pharma
Spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down
The medicine go down-wown
The medicine go down
Just a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down
In a most delightful way! (Mary Poppins)
The classic use of placebos in medicine—to boost the confidence of anxious
patients—has been employed tacitly for ages. Nearly half of the doctors polled
in a 2007 survey in Chicago admitted to prescribing medications they knew
were ineffective for a patient's condition—or prescribing effective drugs
in doses too low to produce actual benefit—in order to provoke a placebo
response.
The fact that taking a sugar pill can powerfully improve some people's health—the
so-called placebo effect—has long been considered an embarrassment to the
serious practice of pharmacology. Ironically, Big Pharma's attempt to dominate
the central nervous system has ended up revealing how powerful the brain
really is. The placebo response doesn't care if the catalyst for healing
is a triumph of pharmacology, a compassionate therapist, or a syringe of
salt water. All it requires is a reasonable expectation of getting better.
That's potent medicine.
The roots of the placebo response can be traced to a lie told by an Army
nurse during World War II as Allied forces stormed the beaches of southern
Italy. The nurse was assisting an anesthetist named Henry Beecher, who was
tending to US troops under heavy German bombardment. When the morphine supply
ran low, the nurse assured a wounded soldier that he was getting a shot of
potent painkiller, though her syringe contained only salt water. Amazingly,
the bogus injection relieved the soldier's agony and prevented the onset
of shock.
Returning to his post at Harvard after the war, Beecher became one of the
nation's leading medical reformers. Inspired by the nurse's healing act of
deception, he launched a crusade to promote a method of testing new medicines
to find out whether they were truly effective. At the time, the process for
vetting drugs was sloppy at best: Pharmaceutical companies would simply dose
volunteers with an experimental agent until the side effects swamped the
presumed benefits. Beecher proposed that if test subjects could be compared
to a group that received a placebo, health officials would finally have an
impartial way to determine whether a medicine was actually responsible for
making a patient better.
In a 1955 paper titled "The Powerful Placebo," published in The Journal of
the American Medical Association, Beecher described how the placebo effect
had undermined the results of more than a dozen trials by causing improvement
that was mistakenly attributed to the drugs being tested. He demonstrated
that trial volunteers who got real medication were also subject to placebo
effects; the act of taking a pill was itself somehow therapeutic, boosting
the curative power of the medicine. Only by subtracting the improvement in
a placebo control group could the actual value of the drug be calculated.
The article caused a sensation. By 1962, reeling from news of birth defects
caused by a drug called thalidomide, Congress amended the Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act, requiring trials to include enhanced safety testing and placebo
control groups. Volunteers would be assigned randomly to receive either medicine
or a sugar pill, and neither doctor nor patient would know the difference
until the trial was over. Beecher's double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized
clinical trial—or RCT—was enshrined as the gold standard of the emerging
pharmaceutical industry. Today, to win FDA approval, a new medication must
beat placebo in at least two authenticated trials. Beecher's prescription
helped cure the medical establishment of outright quackery. The triumph
of Beecher's gold standard was a generation of safer medications that worked
for nearly everyone. Anthracyclines don't require an oncologist with a genial
bedside manner to slow the growth of tumors.
What Beecher didn't foresee, however, was the explosive growth of the pharmaceutical
industry. The blockbuster success of mood drugs in the '80s and '90s emboldened
Big Pharma to promote remedies for a growing panoply of disorders that are
intimately related to higher brain function. By attempting to dominate the
central nervous system, Big Pharma gambled its future on treating ailments
that have turned out to be particularly susceptible to the placebo effect.
From 2001 to 2006, the percentage of new products cut from development after
Phase II clinical trials, when drugs are first tested against placebo, rose
by 20 percent. The failure rate in more extensive Phase III trials increased
by 11 percent, mainly due to surprisingly poor showings against placebo.
Despite historic levels of industry investment in R&D, the US Food and
Drug Administration approved only 19 first-of-their-kind remedies in 2007—the
fewest since 1983—and just 24 in 2008. Half of all drugs that fail in late-stage
trials drop out of the pipeline due to their inability to beat sugar pills.
Why are inert pills suddenly overwhelming promising new drugs and established
medicines alike? The reasons are only just beginning to be understood. A
network of independent researchers is doggedly uncovering the inner workings—and
potential therapeutic applications—of the placebo effect. At the same time,
drugmakers are realizing they need to fully understand the mechanisms behind
it so they can design trials that differentiate more clearly between the
beneficial effects of their products and the body's innate ability to heal
itself. A special task force of the Foundation for the National Institutes
of Health is seeking to stem the crisis by quietly undertaking one of the
most ambitious data-sharing efforts in the history of the drug industry.
After decades in the jungles of fringe science, the placebo effect has become
the elephant in the boardroom.
Part of the problem was that response to placebo was considered a psychological
trait related to neurosis and gullibility rather than a physiological phenomenon
that could be scrutinized in the lab and manipulated for therapeutic benefit.
But then Benedetti came across a study, done years earlier, that suggested
the placebo effect had a neurological foundation. US scientists had found
that a drug called naloxone blocks the pain-relieving power of placebo treatments.
The brain produces its own analgesic compounds called opioids, released under
conditions of stress, and naloxone blocks the action of these natural painkillers
and their synthetic analogs. The study gave Fabrizio Benedetti at the University
of Turin the lead he needed to pursue his own research while running small
clinical trials for drug companies.
Now, after 15 years of experimentation, he has succeeded in mapping many
of the biochemical reactions responsible for the placebo effect, uncovering
a broad repertoire of self-healing responses. Placebo-activated opioids,
for example, not only relieve pain; they also modulate heart rate and respiration.
The neurotransmitter dopamine, when released by placebo treatment, helps
improve motor function in Parkinson's patients. Mechanisms like these can
elevate mood, sharpen cognitive ability, alleviate digestive disorders, relieve
insomnia, and limit the secretion of stress-related hormones like insulin
and cortisol.
William Potter, working on new antidepressants and antianxiety meds, became
one of the first researchers to glimpse the approaching storm. As a psychiatrist,
Potter knew that some patients really do seem to get healthier for reasons
that have more to do with a doctor's empathy than with the contents of a
pill. But it baffled him that drugs he'd been prescribing for years seemed
to be struggling to prove their effectiveness. Thinking that something crucial
may have been overlooked, Potter tapped an IT geek named David DeBrota to
help him comb through the Lilly database of published and unpublished trials—including
those that the company had kept secret because of high placebo response.
They aggregated the findings from decades of antidepressant trials, looking
for patterns and trying to see what was changing over time. What they found
challenged some of the industry's basic assumptions about its drug-vetting
process.
Assumption number one was that if a trial were managed correctly, a medication
would perform as well or badly in a Phoenix hospital as in a Bangalore clinic.
Potter discovered, however, that geographic location alone could determine
whether a drug bested placebo or crossed the futility boundary. By the late
'90s, for example, the classic antianxiety drug diazepam (also known as Valium)
was still beating placebo in France and Belgium. But when the drug was tested
in the US, it was likely to fail. Conversely, Prozac performed better in
America than it did in western Europe and South Africa. It was an unsettling
prospect: FDA approval could hinge on where the company chose to conduct
a trial.
Mistaken assumption number two was that the standard tests used to gauge
volunteers' improvement in trials yielded consistent results. Potter and
his colleagues discovered that ratings by trial observers varied significantly
from one testing site to another. It was like finding out that the judges
in a tight race each had a different idea about the placement of the finish
line. The geographic variations in trial outcome that Potter uncovered begin
to make sense in light of discoveries that the placebo response is highly
sensitive to cultural differences. Anthropologist Daniel Moerman found that
Germans are high placebo reactors in trials of ulcer drugs but low in trials
of drugs for hypertension—an undertreated condition in Germany, where many
people pop pills for herzinsuffizienz, or low blood pressure. Moreover, a
pill's shape, size, branding, and price all influence its effects on the
body. Soothing blue capsules make more effective tranquilizers than angry
red ones, except among Italian men, for whom the color blue is associated
with their national soccer team—Forza Azzurri! Potter and DeBrota's
data-mining also revealed that even superbly managed trials were subject
to runaway placebo effects. But exactly why any of this was happening remained
elusive.
Ten years and billions of R&D dollars after Potter first sounded the
alarm about the placebo effect, his message has finally gotten through. In
the spring, Potter, who is now a VP at Merck, helped rev up a massive data-gathering
effort called the Placebo Response Drug Trials Survey. Under the auspices
of the NIH, Potter and his colleagues are acquiring decades of trial data—including
blood and DNA samples—to determine which variables are responsible for the
apparent rise in the placebo effect. Merck, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline,
Sanofi-Aventis, Johnson & Johnson, and other major firms are funding
the study.
The pharma crisis has also finally brought together the two parallel streams
of placebo research—academic and industrial. Pfizer has asked Fabrizio Benedetti
to help the company figure out why two of its pain drugs keep failing. Ted
Kaptchuk is developing ways to distinguish drug response more clearly from
placebo response for another pharma house that he declines to name. Both
are exploring innovative trial models that treat the placebo effect as more
than just statistical noise competing with the active drug. http://www.wired.com/medtech/drugs/magazine/17-09/ff_placebo_effect/?currentPage=1
Pharma and Biotech
Industry
Since Q4 2007, research spending in the U.S. has dropped 4 percent--or $1.9
billion. But a report in BusinessWeek lists 25 major U.S. corporations that,
despite the economic downturn, have boosted R&D spending significantly
in 2009. Of those 25, 13 were biotech and pharmaceutical companies, with
Merck taking the top spot for increased spending. By comparison, only eight
tech companies made the list.
The reasons for the spending come back to the much-talked-about patent cliff.
Big Pharma is increasing R&D so its pipeline is sufficient to replace
the billions of dollars in products that are going off-patent over the next
few years. Some of that money is being used to mine the industry for licensing
deals, while other companies are simply spending more on clinical trials
as products in their pipeline advance to later stages. The industry's buyout
spree has also contributed to an increased R&D budget.
More R&D spending may not solve the industry's problems though. Critics
note that pumping more money into research has not resulted in more sales,
and the industry's new drug offerings have dropped.
Merck (up $371 million from 2008), Biogen Idec ($185.4 million), Eli Lilly
($159.1 million), Bristol-Myers Squibb ($144 million), and Gilead ($98.6
million) were the top five companies to make the list. View this chart (http://www.businessweek.com/table/09/0827_biotech_research_spending.html)
to see data on all 25 companies. http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/aug2009/db20090827_362578.htm
Vertical Farming
is the Solution
The floods and droughts that have come with climate change are wreaking havoc
on traditional farmland. Three recent floods (in 1993, 2007 and 2008) cost
the United States billions of dollars in lost crops, with even more devastating
losses in topsoil. Changes in rain patterns and temperature could diminish
India’s agricultural output by 30 percent by the end of the century.
What’s more, population increases will soon cause our farmers to run out
of land. The amount of arable land per person decreased from about an acre
in 1970 to roughly half an acre in 2000 and is projected to decline to about
a third of an acre by 2050, according to the United Nations. With billions
more people on the way, before we know it the traditional soil-based farming
model developed over the last 12,000 years will no longer be a sustainable
option.
Irrigation now claims some 70 percent of the fresh water that we use. After
applying this water to crops, the excess agricultural runoff, contaminated
with silt, pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, is unfit for reuse. The
developed world must find new agricultural approaches before the world’s
hungriest come knocking on its door for a glass of clean water and a plate
of disease-free rice and beans.
Imagine a farm right in the middle of a major city. Food production would
take advantage of hydroponic and aeroponic technologies. Both methods are
soil-free. Hydroponics allows us to grow plants in a water-and-nutrient solution,
while aeroponics grows them in a nutrient-laden mist. These methods use far
less water than conventional cultivation techniques, in some cases as much
as 90 percent less.
Now apply the vertical farm concept to countries that are water-challenged
— the Middle East readily comes to mind — and suddenly things look less hopeless.
For this reason the world’s very first vertical farm may be established there,
although the idea has garnered considerable interest from architects and
governments all over the world.
Vertical farms are now feasible, in large part because of a robust global
greenhouse initiative that has enjoyed considerable commercial success over
the last 10 years. (Disclosure: I’ve started a business to build vertical
farms.) There is a rising consumer demand for locally grown vegetables and
fruits, as well as intense urban-farming activity in cities throughout the
United States. Vertical farms would not only revolutionize and improve urban
life but also revitalize land that was damaged by traditional farming. For
every indoor acre farmed, some 10 to 20 outdoor acres of farmland could be
allowed to return to their original ecological state (mostly hardwood forest).
Abandoned farms do this free of charge, with no human help required.
A vertical farm would behave like a functional ecosystem, in which waste
was recycled and the water used in hydroponics and aeroponics was recaptured
by dehumidification and used over and over again. The technologies needed
to create a vertical farm are currently being used in controlled-environment
agriculture facilities but have not been integrated into a seamless source
of food production in urban high-rise buildings.
Such buildings, by the way, are not the only structures that could house
vertical farms. Farms of various dimensions and crop yields could be built
into a variety of urban settings — from schools, restaurants and hospitals
to the upper floors of apartment complexes. By supplying a continuous quantity
of fresh vegetables and fruits to city dwellers, these farms would help combat
health problems, like Type II diabetes and obesity, that arise in part from
the lack of quality produce in our diet.
Read the article at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/opinion/24Despommier.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=A%20Farm%20on%20Every%20Floor&st=cse
Failures of Big Pharma
Faced with a disappointing set of late-stage data, Eli Lilly has stopped
work on the osteoporosis drug arzoxifene--a program that had been counted
as one of its top three near-term drug prospects. After a five-year study
dubbed Generations, Lilly researchers concluded that the drug did not prevent
a variety of secondary conditions, including nonspinal fractures. The therapy
also raised the risk of blood clots and hot flashes. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a2EhgicDWDzA
A first-of-its-kind osteoporosis drug lowers the risk of bone fractures as
well as or better than current medicines, studies in older women and men
with prostate cancer suggest. Wall Street sees Amgen Inc.'s genetically engineered
denosumab as a potential blockbuster crucial to the company's future. But
given the crowded market of treatments for the bone-thinning disease, doctors
see its expected high cost as a big drawback. The effectiveness of denosumab
and existing drugs appears to plateau after two or three years.
Global sales of osteoporosis treatments, including hundreds of vitamin brands,
exceeded $8.3 billion last year, according to data from IMS Health. About
10 million Americans have osteoporosis, and another 44 million are at increased
risk because of low bone density.
India's Glenmark Pharmaceuticals and its U.S. partner Forest Laboratories
revealed that their experimental COPD drug failed a Phase IIb trial. While
well tolerated at all dose levels, researchers said that oglemilast--Glenmark's
lead development program--failed to post a statistically significant efficacy
outcome.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125065856551642397.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Italy's Gentium saw its shares sag on the news that its experimental therapy
to treat the blockage of small veins in the liver failed the primary and
secondary endpoints of a late-stage trial. The veno-occlusive disease treatment
defibrotide demonstrated "strong trends" in its favor, but failed to deliver
the necessary data for complete response following 100 days after a stem
cell transplant compared to patients receiving a best-care drug as well as
an improved survival rate after 100 days and six months following treatment.
http://www.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUSBNG47362120090819
Johnson & Johnson's drug development unit has been slapped with a warning
letter saying that it "did not adhere to the applicable statutory requirements
and FDA regulations governing the conduct of clinical investigations." http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssHealthcareNews/idUSN1841534620090818
Johnson & Johnson is consolidating management, starting by eliminating
the smallest of its four business groups, with more changes expected over
the next several weeks.
In a strike against GlaxoSmithKline's Avandia, a new study found that it
carries more heart risks than rival Actos. http://lists.fiercemarkets.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,18enm,8ku,gcuz,kc6c,jbrk,by1k
In a landmark case that has sparked a heated debate about patent linkage
in India, Delhi's high court threw out Bayer's petition to block Indian generics
maker Cipla from gaining regulatory approval for its version. http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/indian-court-dismisses-bayers-nexavar-patent-claim/2009-08-18
The JAMA delivered a mixed blessing to Merck's Gardasil. In a headliner study
published by the Journal of the American Medical Association, the side effects
of the human papillomavirus shot were deemed reasonable. And another JAMA
study dropped a bombshell: Merck gave money to three medical societies to
fund their promotion of Gardasil. http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/jama-gardasil-safe-promos-questionable/2009-08-19
Sanofi-aventis said that it would close its Kansas City manufacturing facility.
The operation employs about 370 workers, a company spokesman said.
Boehringer Ingelheim will ax between 600 and 900 pharmaceutical sales reps
as the company heads over a generic cliff in 2010, according to Pharmagossip
and CafePharma. Pharmagossip reported that “600 or more” reps got the ax
recently.
The manufacturing debacle unfolding at Genzyme Corp is not just hurting its
bottom line: it threatens to dent the company's reputation for years to come.
Genzyme, which is one of the world's biggest and most respected biotech companies,
halted production in June at its Allston Landing plant in Boston due to contamination
caused by a virus. The shut-down led to shortages of two of its biggest drugs:
Cerezyme for Gaucher disease and Fabrazyme for Fabry disease, two rare genetic
disorders. The drugs generated $1.7 billion of sales in 2008.
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International said preliminary results showed its
experimental drug for the treatment of pain associated with shingles failed
to meet the main goal of a mid-stage trial.
Eli Lilly and Co said it has offered buyouts to 4,000 of its U.S. sales representatives,
in hopes several hundred of them will accept the offers ahead of a planned
company restructuring. Employees who accept the buyout will be offered the
company's standard severance package plus additional four months pay. Lilly
employees have been notified that the restructuring, to be announced in November
and begin in January, will reduce the size of its sales territories.
FDA Approvals for August
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm?fuseaction=Reports.MonthlyApprovalsAll
Ocimum
Biosolutions
Ocimum Biosolutions is a global integrated genomics services company with
over 250 employees in Gaithersburg, MD in the US; Hyderabad, India; and The
Netherlands. Ocimum provides comprehensive genomic reference databases, life
science lab information management solutions, GLP-compliant microarray services
and essential research consumables. Ocimum's BioExpress® and ToxExpress®
are genomic services. Ocimum has been consistently ranked as India’s fastest
growing biotechnology company and one of the fastest growing technology companies
in Asia over the last four years by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. Ocimum Biosolutions,
a leading integrated life sciences solutions company, has been listed in
the third annual Inc. 5000, an exclusive ranking of the America’s fastest-growing
private companies. The list represents the most comprehensive look at the
most important segment of the economy—America’s independent-minded entrepreneurs.
Anu Acharya is the founder and CEO of Ocimum Biosolutions. The company was
founded in the year 2000 and has completed 3 international acquisitions,
Gene Logic Genomics from Maryland, USA in the year 2007, Isogen Life Sciences
from the Netherlands in 2006 and the GD business of MWG Biotech of Germany
in 2005.
Pain Medication for
Dogs
Abbott has partnered with Velcera, Inc., a specialty pharmaceutical company
focused on pet health, to market the first canine pain management product
delivered in a transmucosal mist form. Currently in clinical trials, the
product combines the proven pain medication meloxicam, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drug (NSAID) with Velcera's patented Promist(TM) technology, and has been
globally licensed for pain management in dogs.
FDA 505(b)(2) Approval
for Teva
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. announced U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) approval and launch of Oxaliplatin Injection. Teva’s 505(b)(2) New
Drug Application provides for the use of Oxaliplatin Injection, 50 mg/10
mL and 100 mg/20 mL for adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer in patients
who have undergone complete resection of the primary tumor and treatment
of advanced colorectal cancer. In June, the U.S. District Court for
the District of New Jersey granted summary judgment in Teva's favor on the
issue of non-infringement with regard to Debiopharm's U.S. Patent No. 5,338,874.
The patent is listed in the Orange Book for Sanofi-Aventis' Eloxatin®
(oxaliplatin injection) which had annual sales of approximately $1.3 billion
in the United States for the twelve months that ended December 31, 2008,
based on IMS sales data. Sanofi-Aventis and Debiopharm have appealed this
decision. Sanofi-Aventis has also sued the FDA seeking to rescind all approvals
granted to date for Oxaliplatin Injection pending resolution of the outstanding
appeal.
Alzheimer's Disease Research
A new class of molecules capable of blocking the formation of specific protein
clumps that are believed to contribute to the dementia of Alzheimer’s disease
(AD) patients has been discovered by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania
School of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Chemical Genomics
Center (NCGC). By assaying close to 300,000 compounds, the team has identified
drug-like inhibitors of AD tau protein clumping, as reported in the journal
Biochemistry. The researchers found a total of 285 compounds that were of
potential interest, and of these they focused on a specific chemical series
called ATPZs that effectively block fibril formation. The ATPZs fit most
of the criteria for potential drug candidacy such as proper size, desirable
chemical properties, specificity for the tau protein, and a predicted likelihood
of crossing the blood-brain barrier. Tau fibrils accumulate as insoluble
deposits in brain nerve cells of patients with a host of debilitating neurodegenerative
diseases, the most prevalent of which is AD. Since these tau aggregates are
found in several neurodegenerative disorders and are thought to contribute
to disease pathology, it is hoped that drugs that prevent these deposits
might prove to be effective therapeutic agents for AD and related disorders.
Source: The
primary sources cited above,
BBC News, New York Times (NYT),
Washington Post (WP), Mercury News,
Bayarea.com, Chicago Tribune, CNN, USA
Today, Intellihealthnews, Deccan
Chronicle (DC), the Hindu, Hindustan
Times, Times of India, AP, Reuters,
AFP, Biospace
etc.
Notice: The
content of the articles is intended to provide general
information. Specialist advice should be sought about
your specific circumstances.
|
|
|
|
|
|