Patent News:
Profit from Ideas
New Patent Regime in the Indian Union
The Indian Union
(Bhaarat) has come
a long way in the past 35 years under the protectionist patent regime, especially
after
Bhaarat was liberated by the Father of Modern Indian
Economy,
Prime
Minister Venkatanarasimharao Pamulaparti (PV) in 1990s.
Bhaarat
has developed a very strong presence in the bulk drugs and generics and
is making forays into new drugs as well via contract manufacturing for branded
drugs for multinationals.
Bhaarat has successfully
lowered the prices for pharmaceuticals while shifting control of their pharmaceutical
market to domestic companies.
Bhaarat emerged as one
of the leading producers of generic drugs in the world market and is ready
for the new patent regime of 2005. However, not even a single new drug was
introduced into the competitive world market. Now, product patent protection
is desired by the Indian pharmaceutical industry for it to maintain a competitive
edge in the global economy.
Bhaarat began to emphasise a perverse inward-looking
policy and the ‘‘foreign hand’’ theory of the 1970s was extended to scientific
collaborations. Cooperation with the major powers was viewed with
deep suspicion. As a result, international cooperation in areas of science
and technology became a major casualty. Even today, the patent question
has been marked by sharp controversies over public policy in the Indian
pharmaceutical industry.
Bhaarat has a commitment to
modify its patent system to provide for product patents by January 1, 2005.
A third amendment to the Patent Act to finalize the TRIPS compliance
is still pending. Indians need to carefully adopt a strategy to counter
opposition to the so-called "2005 threat" and exploit the great new opportunities
that will be unraveled.
Bhaarat is better placed
than many developing countries, but a sense of urgency has been missing.
Bhaarat has had missed several golden opportunities
due to the socialist lethargy and inertia of its centralized economy. Here
is another golden opportunity to catch the bus that has the potential to
transform
Bhaarat and the world.
According to the father of modern Indian economy and reforms, the former
Prime Minister of
Bhaarat Venkatanarasimharao Pamulaparti (PV),
who initiated the economic reforms in early 1990s making a U-turn from Nehruvian
economy, "[t]he trend toward a truly global marketplace must be promoted
and not retarded by protectionism, unilateralism, and discriminatory trade
practices.” Yet, the 10-year transition period hasn’t been used
well enough to develop the best machinery, and recently the Parliament adjourned
until next year without passing the required legislation to comply with the
TRIPS, despite the fact that on May 4, 2004, America placed India on the
Priority Watch List for lax IP laws along with 14 other countries. The
Indian Government was forced to promulgate an ordinance in December 2004
to comply with WTO.
Many Indians fear the new patent regime. In December 2004 there have
been demonstrations against new patent regime. The fears are not only exaggerations,
but also baseless, especially in medicine and healthcare.
Bhaarat
has a sofisticated genereic drug industry. Fortunately, most of the essential
drugs are not under patent protection. Less than 10% of India's list
of essential drugs are covered by patents worldwide. Moreover, only
one drug in 250 in the WTO's list of essential drugs is currently under patent.
Further, a large number of off-patent substitutes are available to patients
for patented drugs. In addition, between 2005-2010, patents of
many widely used drugs will expire, e.g., in 2005, the drugs going off patent
include glimepiride, ondansetron, clarithromycin, fluconazole, pamiotronate
disodium, zidovudine, pravastatin sodium, pranlukasf, azithomycin, paroxetine,
simvastalin and sertraline. This basically implies a huge potential in national
and international generic markets. Accordingly, fears that a new product
patent regime would escalate drug prices, displace the local pharmaceutical
industry, result in re-colonization of India by multinational corporations,
increase drug imports, and wipe out small farmers are gross exaggerations.
Recently, while maintaining that the fears of price rise in drugs are
unfounded, Mr Kamal Nath, Union Commerce and Industry Minister held that
the product patent regime would strengthen the pharmaceutical industry and
information technology sector. Exports of pharma products are likely to touch
Rs 14,000 crore (~3.3 billion USD) during the current fiscal,
according
to the Minister.
In addition, not only
Bhaarat has a sofisticated genereic
drug industry, but also she has the traditional knowledge of health and
medicine, known as
Yoga and
Ayurveda respectively,
having a history of more than 5,000 years.
Yoga is an ancient
Indian discipline and method of living. Sage Patnajali laid down the
principles of
Yoga around 2nd century BC. The Bhagavad Gita
(the Divine Song) of Lord Krishna contains
yoga concepts to help
seekers perform one's duty. The discipline of
Yoga enables
its followers to meet the challenges of life and move into a state of peace
and harmony. According to the National Institutes of Health, when
people actively seek to reduce the stress in their lives by quieting the
mind, the body often works to heal itself. In this sense,
yoga
can be seen not only as a way to get into shape on several levels, but also
as a tool for self-healing. There are numerous ways to work on the physical
fitness. Few, however, bring as many benefits to the body, mind and spirit
as
yoga. There are several types of
yoga, including
hatha
yoga,
karma yoga,
bhakti yoga and
raja yoga. These
types vary in the proportions of the eight branches. In America and Europe,
hatha yoga is commonly practiced, including
praanayama
and
aasana.
Ayurveda is the extraordinary mind-body medicine of
Bhaarat
with its great yogic spiritual tradition, a tradition, and a tremendous resource
for bringing wholeness to all levels of our existence. It is one of
the worlds oldest and most complete systems of natural healing, containing
great wisdom for all humanity.
Ayurveda is a completely natural
way of obtaining health, harmony, and happiness.
Ayurvedic principles
are known to have influenced the development of Chinese, Arabic, Greek,
and Roman medicine. More recently, Western medicine has also adopted
Ayurvedic concepts and therapies.
Bhaarat,
a society that has thousands of years of monopoly over
Ayurveda -
one of the oldest and effective systems of medicines in the world - need
not worry about a petty 20-year monopoly over a new product, especially when
America is increasingly looking for help from
Ayurveda and other alternative
medicines.
An increasing number of clinical studies are demonstrating efficacy of
Ayurvedic medicine in America, despite Indian apathy and disinterest.
Such efficacious
Ayurvedic medicine include Terminalia arjuna,
Zingiber officinale (ginger), Prunus amygdalus, ashwagandha, Boswellia serrata,
Thymus vulgaris, Coccinia indica, Curumina longa (turmeric) etc.
Ayurvedic
Institutes and hospitals are growing in America. It should also be noted that
the American Congress established the Office of Alternative Medicine in 1992
and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
in 1999. The funding appropriated by Congress for NCCAM for fiscal year 2004
is $117.7 million and the estimated funding for the year 2005 is $121.1 million.
The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) is
one of the 27 institutes and centers that make up the National Institutes
of Health (NIH). The NIH is one of eight agencies under the Public Health
Service (PHS) in the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
NCCAM is dedicated to exploring complementary and alternative healing practices
in the context of rigorous science, training complementary and alternative
medicine (CAM) researchers, and disseminating authoritative information to
the public and professionals.
In addition,
Bhaarat is also endowed with Islamic and Arabic
traditional Unani medicine and European homeopathic medicine. The claims
that these Indian traditional systems work wonders, are being tested
in America and
Bhaarat.
Accordingly, even if the new medicines developed by the Western modern
medicine such as improvements for Viagra and Lipitor turn out to be very
expensive and not affordable to the Indian poor, thousands of years of time-tested
and invaluable Indian healthcare products should come to their rescue.
For example, an Indian, who cannot afford to buy a statin cholesterol lowering
agent, can obtain relief with an Ayruvedic medicine such as guggulu under
the strict supervision of an
Ayurvedic practitioner and following
the
Yoga and Ayruvedic principles that must be followed with
the use of
Ayurvedic medications. Such
Ayurvedic alternatives
can be found for, almost all, expensive Western medications.
The Indian argument against patenting new uses to ancient knowledge is
also flawed at least in one aspect. Indians have had this knowledge
for thousands of years through ancient texts of
Ayurveda.
So far they have not used that knowledge to help the world at large by supplying
inexpensive drugs for the third world in a large scale. However, some
Indians view any new use of the ancient knowledge, or identification of
active principles from these ancient medicines under the patent protection,
as plunder of ancient Indian knowledge by the West. This
resistance to the so-called "20-year monopoly," while continuing to have
thousands of years of monopoly without even attempting to provide the benefits
of the knowledge to the entire world cannot be rationalized.
Moreover, the Western pharmaceutical industry has minimal interest in
diseases such as malaria, leprosy and tuberculosis that plague
Bhaarat.
As a result, there is no "free ride" available for Indians in this area.
To the extent that
Bhaarat has special needs that are not as
acutely felt in the West, technological development that affects such needs
will not occur. Lack of product patent protection does not help the
local industry in such an endeavor. Thus,
Bhaarat
has been paying a stiff price for the absence of an effective patent system.
Accordingly, the Indian drug industry and the Indian government no longer
have an excuse for any "free ride", and must invest in research related to
unique Indian problems and develop new drugs.
The pharmaceutical industry worldwide devotes a great amount of its resources
for R&D. In America, the pharmaceutical industry spent 18.5% of
total 2001 sales toward R&D.
Bhaarat must catch up
with the investment in R&D to be competitive in the global economy.
Currently, the Indian pharmaceutical industry's R&D spending is a paltry
1.8% of the total turnover. This low investment in R&D is
reflective of the "free ride" and lack of product patent protection, which
hindered Indian R&D for the past 35 years. Indian pharmaceutical
companies need product patent protection to encourage drug development research
for both domestic and lucrative Western markets.
The product patent regime would foster a competitive environment for the
availability of drugs and pharmaceuticals in the country, a potential market
of over one billion consumers. Patent law changes in 2005 could open
up the doors for the successful Indian firms to the American healthcare system’s
need for less expensive generic drugs. Unlike the past, when American
consumers would not accept a product made in
Bhaarat, they
are willing to obtain medication cross-border and via mail order to avoid
higher prices.
There has been a rise in foreign direct investment into
Bhaarat
despite falls in foreign direct investment across the world.
IPRs reduce uncertainty for multinational foreign pharmaceutical companies
that plan to enter the Indian market. Another anticipated consequence
of strengthening patent protection to be TRIPS compliant is job displacement
from developed countries to
Bhaarat, due to the availability
of competitive scientific talent. Offshore outsourcing to lower cost
countries like
Bhaarat, a new phenomenon that involves the
migration of jobs, ranging from call center operators to computer programmers,
is growing. In the future, similar job movement from America
to
Bhaarat will occur in the pharmaceutical sector as well.
Bhaarat is currently experiencing a cultural, political
and ideological shift in favor of intellectual property protection as evidenced
by her willingness to be bound by international intellectual property standards.
In
Bhaarat, where research and innovation have traditionally
been neglected by the domestic industry that enjoyed the so-called "free
ride", the pharmaceutical industry is realizing the importance of R&D.
The success stories of Ranbaxy and Reddy Laboratories in the R&D field
have inspired others. Several Indian pharmaceutical companies
including Cipla, Lupin, Nicholas Piramal, Torrent and Wockhardt are today
engaged in R&D activities.
Bhaarat has a vast R&D
infrastructure that includes the extensive network of national labs, academic
institutes and private R&D labs. With the advent of an integrated
global economy,
Bhaarat is a force to reckon with, poised to
capitalize on its new patent regime, but only if implemented properly and
strictly.
Bhaarat, being the largest and modern democracy in
the world, faces several challenges in implementing the international laws-
including the need to create intellectual property legislation that is both
a sword and a shield. The challenges are at least threefold.
The first challenge is to pass new pieces of legislation through the Parliament.
As a thriving democracy with a multiparty system, where political coalitions
are the order of the day, it is a daunting task to legislate any laws that
are perceived and portrayed as anti-people or anti-poor. Secondly,
even if the laws are promulgated through the parliamentary process, they
could be challenged on various Constitutional or other grounds in the Supreme
Court. Thirdly, after surviving the above challenges, the laws would
be toothless and useless, if not supported by an efficient system to implement
the laws without corruption, to the fullest extent of the law. A household
survey released by Transparency International on 17 December 2002, reported
high levels of corruption in public institutions in South Asia. Of the seven
major public institutions, the police emerged as the most corrupt in all
five countries surveyed (Bangladesh,
Bhaarat, Nepal, Pakistan
and Sri Lanka). The judiciary was identified as the second most corrupt area
in
Bhaarat.
America's preeminence in science and technology is, without a doubt, due
to a large extent to its patent regime. Indian realization of the potential
of its individual citizens to unleash their creativity via providing protection
to their products and inventions is long overdue. Without a new strong patent
regime,
Bhaarat will continue to be a third world country.
In this context it may be pertinent to remember what the President of
Bhaarat
Avul Pakir Jalaluddin Abdul Kalam stated when he was the Principal Scientific
Advisor to the Government of
Bhaarat, "A developed country
is one which has the capability and the capacity to comprehensively look
at wealth generation and wealth protection and thereafter evolve integrated
strategies, technologies and missions to meet these objectives. It
is also a fact that technology is the established currency of geo-political
power and in the Indian context; technology has to be the driving force
for economic development and national security.”
Ayurveda in America
A US health survey in 2000 estimated that 750,000 American adults also
had
Ayurvedic cures. The U.S medical community is taking
Ayurveda
seriously enough to monitor the cures and pharmaceutical industry is preparing
to grind its axe too. Amid
Ayurveda’s progressive recognition
in the US in the face of steep increases in medical care and drug costs
comes a study. American herbal products allegedly based on the
Ayurveda
medicine and sold in the US contain dangerous levels of lead, mercury and
arsenic, researchers have cautioned in a study published in the latest issue
of the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA). Researchers from the
Harvard Medical School reported that Herbal Medical Products (HMPs) sold
as remedies for treatment of ailments such as arthritis and diabetes contained
toxic levels high enough to cause poisoning.
While, the maelstrom over the medications Vioxx, Celebrex and Aleve is
creating confusion and doubt not only among patients, but also their doctors.
These studies and warnings affect millions of Americans who have come to
take for granted the safety of drugs on the market. Pfizer announced recently
that a study of Bextra found that it increased the risk of heart attacks.
Aleve was the fourth big-selling pain medicine in recent months to be suspected
of hurting the heart, and federal drug officials said that similar drugs,
like Advil, Mobic and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, might also increase
heart risks. We know gastrointestinal bleeding is a class phenomenon
already. Sorting through the conflicting studies and considering the
risks and benefits of medications is rarely simple. We are essentially no
better off than we were in the days of snake-oil salesmen, says FDA scientist
David Graham. Now that the confidence in FDA and pharmaceutical industry
has been shaken, it is even more difficult.
A synthetic form of a sea-snail venom was approved on December 28th by the
Food and Drug Administration as a novel approach to treating severe, chronic
pain. The drug, called Prialt, was approved for hard-to-treat pain associated
with cancer, AIDS and neuropathies. Based on a compound found in the poison
of the South Pacific cone snail, it controls pain by blocking calcium channels
in nerve cells that transmit pain signals--and may have broad implications
for the future of pain management. It is 1,000 times more powerful than
morphine. So, it is now considered a last resort for long-suffering
patients, rather than a first-line pain medication. But the manufacturer,
Elan Corp. of Ireland, hopes that will change! Ultimately such and other poisons
may provide an alternative for severely affected patients dependent on medications
such as Celebrex, Aleve and Vioxx that have come under fire because of some
indications they may cause heart problems or Americanized Aurvedic medicines
that may contain metal poisons.
Every medication, whether
Ayurvedic or allopathic, is a poison and
has to be used properly and respectfully. We have to realize that these
medications are not candies and even candies are dangerous and are responsible
for obesity and attending disorders and death.
China Invents:
High-tech Soy Fiber
China textile industry association extends soy fiber surfaces and dress
products to the society at present. Soy fiber attracts the wide attention
with its nicer capabilities of moisture absorption, free breath, and warm
protection.
According to the introduction, the soy fiber is the high-tech invented
by China textile science and technology operators, and realized to be produced
by industrialization at first in the world. They take beans which have been
pressed grease out as stuff, and distill plant globins glair, then compose
to made up the aftergrowth plant glair of new style. The technique is the
only fibre invention with entire lore property rights in China till now.
Now China is the only country which can produces this kind of the latest
fiber. The first batch of the top grade soy fiber made clothes goods will
be put into the market in the end of this year.
(
http://www.knittersreview.com/article_yarn.asp?article=/review/product/031009_a.asp)
Lunesta
Insomnia is a problem for millions of people. The Food and Drug
Administration on December 15, 2004 approved a new drug Lunesta for people
with insomnia. Lunesta is made by the pharmaceutical company Sepracor, for
both chronic and occasional insomnia, a problem for millions of people.
Lunesta was approved after clinical trials lasting more than a year showed
it remained effective even when taken over time. The drug, taken as a pill,
is non-narcotic, the company reported, and helps people remain asleep all
night, not just to fall asleep.
Back to the top